Which statement best describes why humans can know about nature?

Which statement best describes why humans can know about nature?

• A. Nature is unknowable.
• B. Knowledge comes from revelation.
• C. Humans can know about nature because it is real, orderly, and we have been made with the capacity to know and discern truth.
• D. Science cannot discern truth.

Answer: (C)

Humans can know about nature because the natural world exists as something real and operates under stable, discoverable laws, and we are equipped with cognitive abilities to observe, reason, and test ideas. When nature is real and orderly, patterns and regularities emerge that we can study. Our senses, memory, logic, mathematics, and the scientific method let us gather evidence, form hypotheses, and test them through experiments and observation. This process lets us discern which descriptions of nature reflect how things actually work, not just what we wish were true. That’s why the statement is the best choice: it ties knowledge to the reality and order of the world and to our built-in capacity to understand it. The idea that nature is unknowable contradicts the very success of careful study. The notion that knowledge comes only from revelation excludes empirical inquiry. And the claim that science cannot discern truth runs counter to how evidence and testable explanations have improved our understanding of the natural world.

Humans can know about nature because the natural world exists as something real and operates under stable, discoverable laws, and we are equipped with cognitive abilities to observe, reason, and test ideas. When nature is real and orderly, patterns and regularities emerge that we can study. Our senses, memory, logic, mathematics, and the scientific method let us gather evidence, form hypotheses, and test them through experiments and observation. This process lets us discern which descriptions of nature reflect how things actually work, not just what we wish were true.

That’s why the statement is the best choice: it ties knowledge to the reality and order of the world and to our built-in capacity to understand it. The idea that nature is unknowable contradicts the very success of careful study. The notion that knowledge comes only from revelation excludes empirical inquiry. And the claim that science cannot discern truth runs counter to how evidence and testable explanations have improved our understanding of the natural world.